New New York Times Ipad Interface Changes My Life!

The New York Times changed its Ipad interface a few weeks ago, corresponding with Apple’s new iOS7. I read the Times all the time on my Ipad, so this really changed my life.

I was in a funny position, because I loved the old interface, the NYT app. I thought it far superior to every other newspaper app. The Washington Post, in contrast, was and is pathetic. The WSJ is not very good. The Times, in contrast, was a breeze. I loved how you downloaded the entire content, and so no longer needed a wifi connection. I loved how you could swipe between sections and stories with  a fingertip. I loved how every photo could be a display photo. As an old newspaper man, what an incredible change this is!

So when the Times updated the app, I was nervous. But in general, I have to say the new one is even better. There are some features of the old interface I miss, but all in all the new features, make up for it.

It’s hard to talk about this. I haven’t gone up to any friend or colleague and said, “Have you seen the new New York Times ipad app? Isn’t it incredible?” For some reason, it seems weird and pathetic to do that. So I’m only doing it here, to you, dear readers!

 

Friday Thoughts: Rush, Old Roller Coasters, and Breaking Bad

Old roller coasters, with their rickety wooden slats and rusty iron tracks, and cars that shake you like a rag doll, are much scarier than new roller coasters, no matter how high or fast those swooshing new coasters go with their latest technological tricks. Only the old coasters, like the one I grew up going to in Ocean View Amusement Park in Norfolk, or the still existing Cyclone in Coney Island, make you feel like you are about to die, that you have joined yourself to an enterprise truly unstable and reckless.

That thought came to mind after seeing Ron Howard’s new movie, Rush, which is a movie treatment of the real life competition between the Formula One race car drivers James Hunt and Niki Lauda in 1975-76. It’s being naturally compared to the last great movie made about Formula One racing, Grand Prix in 1966. Which I first saw when I was ten years old or so, with my dad, who was a big car guy. In a big old movie theater with a big old screen. In 70 mm.

The original Grand Prix, which starred James Garner and a few other folks, was that old time roller coaster. Watching it, you felt one, like you were sitting in the seat of a Formula One race car, and two, that you were going to die. It was terrifying. And gripping.

Ron Howard’s movie, in contrast, is a sleek affair. Nothing wrong with it. It’s a good character study. But thoroughly safe for the viewer.

Okay, I know what you’re thinking. Childhood memories will never compare with grown up ones. But here’s the thing. I re-watched Grand Prix 13 years ago, at the ripe old age of 40, on a small television set, and was thoroughly gripped by the three-hour plus movie. I had not expected to be. Thinking back on Grand Prix right now, I realize that its story mirrors the real-life drama to come between Hunt and Lauda ten years later.

In Rush, Howard seldom put the camera in the car. I wonder why? Maybe he didn’t want to be compared to Grand Prix, which he knew he couldn’t beat on its terms, even with all the computers at his disposal. Maybe that was a wise choice even though I’d pick Grand Prix any day, if I had a choice as to which to see.

Now About Breaking Bad

The Roman Empire, according to legend, went bad in its final centuries, indulging in orgies, gladiator games and strange amusements like eating a hundred humming bird tongues and so on.

I have heard less discussion lately as to whether we Americans have joined the Romans in its decline into decadence, and maybe it’s because we have. We have torture porn shows like Homeland and 24. And we have Breaking Bad.

Let me be clear. I loved this show, or at least was profoundly wrapped up in it, as were half of the thinking classes around the country. My partner would hold my hand as we watched. She would worry as she felt me shake and tremble by the intensity of the show. The moral choices of Walter White, played incredible well by Bryan Cranston, really did move me, and sadden me, as they were intended to do.

But the context of those decisions horrified me, and still does. The show passed lines that used to be immutable, time and time again. Children were shot or killed, not just once, but repeatedly. Torture cropped up toward the end. Of course the true horror was seeing Walt, once clearly mostly a good man, choose to kill innocent people, or mostly innocent. Isn’t there something contemptible about us, who choose to watch such fare, as there is in the fictional character Walt, who makes these decisions?

I sense I’m not convincing. It’s true that I’ve long had less tolerance for violence in shows, going back, (seriously), to when I cringed at the Three Stooges hitting each other on television when I was a kid. I wanted them to stop. As I get older, I have even less appetite for such things. But maybe also there are lines that are better off not crossed. Can anyone tell me where to find a good drawing room comedy with some nice witty dialogue? I’ll sign on.

A Death in Cuba Brings Insight and Loss

I had mentioned last Spring that I was traveling to Cuba, and then I didn’t say much about it afterward. The reason was that the trip was fairly traumatic, and was difficult to discuss casually. It did lead to what Henry Adams might call a furtherance of my education, on many levels. Here is the text of the story I wrote about it for Planning Magazine. You’ll have to subscribe to see the whole story, with pictures.



Cuba Up Close

A death brings loss and insight into a country that is lacking.

By Alex Marshall

I had not expected to find myself in Cuba in a hospital that looked like a run-down suburban elementary school. But that’s what happened when a friend unexpectedly died.

Three of us had been bicycling between the cities of Santa Clara and Remedios, and I was excited about the material I was collecting for this story, which was supposed to be about my impressions of the country as my companions and I biked through its cities and countryside. Suddenly my friend Steve, 57 and apparently healthy, collapsed into the roadway. It was a shock, to say the least. Very shortly, we were hustling his body into a passing taxi, with a helpful driver.

In about 15 minutes, I would be at the door of the “new” hospital in Santa Clara, trying to get a medic’s attention. The experience, while traumatic, would take me into places difficult for a foreigner to reach, like the inside of a hospital examining room, a state-owned funeral home, a hearse, and a forensic institute. The autopsy report said that Steve had died of a heart attack.

What I saw that day added to the impressions I had already had: Here was a country that was shockingly primitive. The medical attention my friend received was rudimentary, in facilities that were skeletal. The infrastructure of the country, from transportation to the Internet, was rudimentary at best. I saw an absence of physical and technological resources in a nation that lacks a fully convertible currency, and so persists by barter and self-sufficiency in an age of global trade. I saw people whose lives were lived in very small circles.

This is not to say the country or its people were without their charms or joys. Overall, the nation still resembled the Cuba I’d visited 25 years ago, on a reporting trip. Classic American cars — Packards, Edsels, Chevies, and Studebakers that were antiques a generation ago — still cruised streets lined with glorious, crumbling historic buildings. The people, while lacking employment options, had a lot of time for conversation, dancing, and the arts. It’s also true I did not see the visible hunger or disease evident in Haiti or parts of Africa. I did see worn faces, often with a calm stoicism blended with frustration.

What was new was the addition of a thin veneer of tourism, with its own currency, called “convertibles” or CUCs, that are spent (mostly by tourists) in a separate system of shops, restaurants, and even infrastructure, including a bus system. This influx of tourists also means a new influx of cash for the government, and to some degree regular citizens as well.

Without the merciless mill of capitalism, Havana looks lost in time: an architectural treasure trove

The past is present

By most standards, Cuba is still a ThirdWorld nation. This was brought home to me again and again. One of my first “aha” moments had come on our first full day of bicycling, in Cienfuegos, a city founded in the 1800s whose crumbling buildings lined the broad, tree-lined streets. It could have been an aging city in France or Spain, if either country had fallen on hard times. The city sits on an oval-shaped, hill-ringed bay that empties into the Caribbean.

Bicycling through the streets at 9 a.m. during a weekday rush hour, I was surprised to be surrounded by horse-drawn carts that accommodated six or eight people at a time. It turned out that this was the go-to form of mass transit here and in other towns we would bike through, though not in Havana.

The extensive use of horse-drawn carts as people movers meant Cuba’s transportation system had reverted to the 19th century, when horse-drawn streetcars were common in the U.S. and elsewhere.

By American standards, the traffic here was light. But it was amazingly diverse, mixing horse-drawn vehicles with cars, as well as bicyclists and even people on foot. The buses seemed cobbled together from various remnants. Once I saw a Mercedes cab-style truck pulling a giant, rusty metal container with passengers inside. These sorts of vehicles contrasted with the clean new conventional buses that tourists used in the “Viazul” system, a network of modern buses and stations that is accessible only to those who have CUCs to spend.

My trip into the country’s health and police system simply deepened my impression of a nation sorely lacking resources.

Cuba has a reputation for excellent health care. So in my unexpected journey into its medical system, I expected to be impressed. Instead I was shocked at the worn, run-down hospital corridors and the appearance of staff simply standing around, doing nothing. When our car pulled up at the emergency room entrance, I had to work to get anyone’s attention and eventually had to help remove the body myself.

This sort of thing happened repeatedly. Hours after we arrived, the mortuary drivers nonchalantly asked my help in lifting my friend’s body off a hospital gurney, into a body bag, and then into the back of a hearse. Was this the communal nature of the society? I didn’t know.

What was clear was the bare-bones nature of the place. I had heard how well trained Cuba’s doctors were, and I saw nothing to contradict this. But a lack of resources must impact their skills eventually. At one point during what would be a very long day, I sat down in “the library,” apparently reserved for off-duty doctors. One of the resources was a box with worn, dog-eared index cards, referencing journal articles from years past. There were no computers in sight.

Parts of the hospital were dirty. To cite one vivid example: Directly across from the examining room where doctors tried to revive my friend was a bathroom with an overflowing toilet and broken sink; there was no place for visitors to wash their hands.

I am often critical of American health care, on a variety of grounds. But things occurred in Cuba that would never happen in an American hospital. After my friend Steve had been declared dead, I asked the doctor his name, a routine question in a hospital in the U.S.

“Why do you want to know?” he asked. I explained that I was keeping a record of things so I could explain to my friend’s family what had occurred. The doctor reluctantly gave his name. A similar exchange occurred later the same day. This time the doctor would only give her first name. What did these doctors fear?

As the day progressed, it was as if I was being given a tour of the country’s meager resources. In the later afternoon it was decided I should accompany the body to a state-owned mortuary home, and then to Havana, where an autopsy would be performed. As the person in our group who spoke the best Spanish, I was the most likely candidate for these tasks.

From the hospital, the two attendants and I loaded my friend’s body into a Chinese-made truck or station wagon that bore the name “Great Wall” on the steering wheel. It had been converted into a hearse. On the side were the words Funeraria Las Villas, a state-owned funeral service, I was told.

When we got to the funeral home, I was again greeted with worn hallways and a general decrepitude. I asked for a place to wash my hands, which I hadn’t done in some hours. At first I was shown a bathroom, but again the sink was broken. Finally I was led out into a courtyard, where an ancient faucet emptied into a stone basin in the yard. Someone dug up a sliver of soap for me.

Eventually, a mortuary attendant and I made our way in the hearse to Havana, a journey of about 175 miles, where an autopsy would be performed at the Instituto de Medicina Legal — the forensic medicine center, which occupied another worn cluster of one-story buildings. The police had decided that an autopsy needed to be done that day. We didn’t arrive until late that night, after hours spent searching for the institute. The driver had never been there before.

Jerry-built trucks, classic American cars, bicycles, pedestrians, and even horsecarts share the streets in Cienfuegos, Cuba

On the road

Once on the highway, my perspective shifted from medicine to the state of Cuban transportation. The country does have a few interstate-style, grade-separated, limited-access highways and we took one of those, A1, to Havana. It was deserted.

Often I would only see one other car, far in the distance, on this long, straight road. It was quite a contrast to congested American freeways. The driver said this was typical. So light was the traffic that this would have been a very safe place to bicycle, in contrast to the crowded intercity roads we had taken. It would have been boring, though, with many miles between exits as in the U.S. and nothing much to look at along the way.

“The country’s transportation infrastructure is indeed a pending and major problem and challenge,” says Rainer G. Schultz, a doctoral student in Cuban Studies at the David Rockefeller Center for Latin American Studies at Harvard. “There has been some recent investment and changes in road security; legal-administrative change; railway, air, and urban transport, etc., but it is still far from sufficient.”

In this case, though, the problem was not a lack of highways, but of cars to fill them. The national, intercity train system, which I got glimpses of, was even more decrepit. Havana’s once impressive central station was a wreck, with ancient locomotives and railroad cars creeping out along a few lines to a few cities.

The state of the state

Among the responsibilities of a government are education, public health, food, and public safety. By those measures, Cuba does pretty well. Life expectancy matches that of the U.S., according to United Nations statistics. While the hospital facilities I saw were worn, public health specialists I interviewed in the U.S. said Cuba excels at primary care, including things like clean water, vaccinations, and neonatal care. And in such a heavily policed state, there is little conventional crime.

Then there’s education. According to UNICEF, the country has a 100 percent literacy rate, and 85 percent of the population attends high school, matching or exceeding rates in the U.S. I have some distrust of official statistics, but my travels bore out the country’s emphasis on learning, including in the arts.

Cuba Facts
  • Slightly smaller than Pennsylvania:
  • Pop. 11,061,886 (July 2013 est.)
  • 6.4 physicians/1,000 people (2007)

Source: The World Factbook 2013–14

One day after arriving in Santa Clara, before my friend’s death, I took the opportunity to bicycle to the University of Santa Clara. It was a campus built about seven miles outside the city, from the looks of it in the 1960s. It was a complex of oblong, modernist-style buildings, scattered across a large campus and to my mind set too far apart, making walking difficult. The students seemed like typical college students.

One professor of social sciences I spoke to, Carlos, defended the country’s university system by noting its advantages. “We are a Third World country,” said Carlos, who was dressed in a T-shirt and sweated in the heat while he waited at a bus stop across from the main campus. “But … look at those students [as he gestured to the campus across the street]. All of them are attending without paying a cent. It’s true you have to do without many things, things your family might want. But what is important in life? Culture and learning. You can have that here and live a rich life, rich in culture.”

Later that same day, in Santa Clara’s central plaza, I saw a gaggle of elementary or junior high school students coming out of dance classes that were held in one of the historic buildings on the main square.

Despite good overall health and education, however, the country seems to fail in providing fuller lives for its citizens, including the opportunity to participate meaningfully in their own government. Cuba is still ruled by the Communist party, whose membership is very limited. But much as representative democracy might be important to me, few Cubans I spoke with put it on their list of priorities.

“No hay carne de res,” said one taxi driver, complaining about the lack of beef. I heard this several times. Cubans are fond of beef dishes like ropa vieja, but it’s difficult to obtain because most of it goes to tourists in restaurants that Cubans can’t afford. To the extent they have meat at all, Cubans eat pork and chicken.

One man I spoke to, a retired doctor, said that after more than 50 years of service, he now lived on his pension of $9 a month. He had been invited to a conference in Washington some years ago, but the government would not let him go. He spoke to me from an ancient building, built in 1825, he said, with timbered ceilings that were beautiful but falling down around him.

One owner of a tourist-related business, a muscular man with bulging forearms, noted that Raul Castro, the de facto leader of the country since his brother Fidel Castro fell ill, was opening the country up to both more market activity and overall freedom, including foreign travel and the sale of private property. This was evident. I saw many “for-sale” signs on apartments, a strange sight in Cuba.

This aging hospital in Santa Clara looked grim and deserted

Uncertain future?

Speculation about Cuba’s future has been rampant for a half-century. But Cuba has continued as it was, its streets still filled with antique cars and a Castro still at the helm.

Imagining myself an urban designer, I couldn’t help contemplating what I would do to Cuba if given a free hand and a hefty sum of money, say from a European Union pot of infrastructure development funds. My first thought was to avoid the whole era of postwar American sprawl, and redevelop the country around high-speed or at least vastly improved rail service.

As an island roughly 700 miles long and less than 100 miles wide in most parts, Cuba could make most of its cities and towns easily accessible by rail. You could have a central high-speed rail line down the center of the island, with branches accessing coastal cities. I’m afraid, though, that the populace might demand more private cars and better roads first, and embrace a Cuban version of suburban cul-de-sacs.

Julio Cesar Perez, a Cuban architect and urban planner who is currently a visiting professor at Harvard, said my idea for development based around rail was not so crazy. In an exchange of e-mails, Perez noted that his own Master Plan for the 21st Century Havana, a set of plans for the renewal of that city and intended as a model the entire country, revolves around improving the train service and using it as a vehicle for development.

“This has a historic background” that any such plan could build on, Perez wrote in an e-mail. “Cuba was the fifth country in the world to start a railroad system, back in 1837, even before Spain, despite being a Spanish colony then.”

But when and how quickly faster development comes to Cuba is anyone’s guess. Certainly a key factor is how long the U.S. maintains its virtually complete economic embargo. The Obama administration has loosened travel restrictions to the extent it can. Right now family members, full-time journalists, and officially organized tours can all travel legally from the U.S. If travel were truly opened — and this would mean Congress repealing or altering the 1996 Helms-Burton Act, which maintains the economic embargo — the country would be transformed simply by the flood of American tourists. I’m glad I had a chance to see it again before this happens.

One potential area of appeal is the country’s historic architecture. Ironically, because of communism, which halted capitalism’s merciless mill, very little has been torn down or built since Fidel Castro took power in 1959. Thus, the country is a preservationist’s dream. It is not unusual in Cuban towns and cities to see a profusion of styles and histories. Within one block you might see a colonial-era building from the 1600s or 1700s, with columns carved from coral, next to an ornate 19th century Beaux Arts building, followed by crisp-lined midcentury modernism.

Cuba seems to have particularly embraced modernism before Castro’s revolution. You find a profusion of chrome railings and cantilevered, butterfly-winged porticos, and curving concrete balconies.

Many groups in the U.S. have noticed Cuba’s treasure trove of historic architecture, as well as its decaying infrastructure. They are motivated by a mixture of ideology, future profit, historical interest, and nationalism. Institutions include the Cuban Transition Project at the University of Miami, the Center for Cuban Studies in New York, and many others.

Until Cuba’s leadership changes dramatically, or its leaders make different decisions, this island of about 11 million people will continue on a path remarkably different from the rest of the world. Those on the outside who care about the country are still relegated to the status of interested observers.

Alex Marshall, a writer and journalist for 25 years, is the author of The Surprising Design of Market Economies and How Cities Work. He is a senior fellow at the Regional Plan Association in New York City.

Resources

Images: Top — Without the merciless mill of capitalism, Havana looks lost in time: an architectural treasure trove. Photo by Lyman Labry. Middle — Jerry-built trucks, classic American cars, bicycles, pedestrians, and even horsecarts share the streets in Cienfuegos, Cuba. Photo by Alex Marshall. Bottom — This aging hospital in Santa Clara looked grim and deserted. Photo by Alex Marshall.

. . . . [to read the entire story, go to Planning Magazine and subscribe.]

Friday Thoughts: From Glass House to Glass Phone

Thanks to my friend Bob, who set up the trip, I visited architect Philip Johnson’s iconic and in some ways almost cliched “Glass House” outside New Canaan, Connecticut. I say cliched because it’s been so photographed, and its image so disseminated, that it’s easy to see it as a joke. A glass house! Right. How could anyone possibly live there? It’s a concept, not a house.

Visiting it though, it’s easily seen that it’s one, beautiful, and two, easily lived in. And the reason is that the house sits on Johnson’s 49-acre estate. So when you lay down to sleep in a bed surrounded by windows on three sides, it’s meadows and trees that surround you, not prying eyes.The nature is part of the house. This is great – if you have 49 acres.

But I’m not criticizing, just clarifying.

As it happened, the same day I visited Johnson’s glass house I downloaded the new iOS7 operating system for my Iphone. And I was struck by how the physical shape of the phone, with its glass window, was reminiscent of Johnson’s glass house. I think it’s fair to say that  both the Iphone and the Glass House are works of modernism. I’m trying to interest some editors in this idea, so stay tuned.

Friday Thoughts:20/09/13 – Local Institutions Matter

I’m down in Virginia Beach right now, having spoken at the Naro Movie theater in Norfolk and at WHRV about my new book. Neat to be back in my hometown.
The Naro movie theater, nestled on Colley Avenue in the heart of the neighborhood of Ghent, is such a lovely institution. The two guys who run it, Tom and Tench, have created something that for 35 years has functioned and grown into a community center and community builder of sorts. When you go to see a movie there, or go to talk there, you’re going to a place that functions as watering hole for people interested in the arts, in ideas, in politics. Not just the neighborhood but the city and region would be poorer without it. I know that this pair, Tom and Tench, have had to be endlessly creative in keeping this enterprise alive as a business in the face of various larger forces that want to wipe them out.
Seeing this institution, relatively healthy and prosperous, I was struck again by how so many important things in a city’s or community’s life are created partly by chance or happenstance. There are much larger cities that lack this kind of institution. It was created in Norfolk by the lucky combination of a pair of guys back in the mid 1970s who had a vision, a theater that was available, this theater being right on what was or would become the central walking and strolling street of the district if not the city, and some other factors I’m not aware of. These are factors that are hard to plan, or to put in a formula, yet at the same time must be encouraged somehow.
Here’s a link to my now past-tense appearance a few days ago, http://narocinema.com/calendar/view.php?id=1781&show=13007
And here’s a link to my talk on the radio on WHRV in Norfolk, on the Hearsay show by Cathy Lewis. http://www.whro.org/home/html/podcasts/hearsay/09172013.mp3